I think it was mostly the testemony of her
'accomplice' and the fact that she claimed not to even know... also she's poor and ugly and fick and has too many children...
was there not also something from social services saying she was at least a partial threat to her children...?
( ,
Fri 5 Dec 2008, 14:19,
archived)
was there not also something from social services saying she was at least a partial threat to her children...?
I think they probably do a good job in hard circumstances most of the time
Although I don't know a great deal about the evidence presented to be found guilty by the Jury it would have to have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt -- otherwise it will get overturned at the appeal stage.
( ,
Fri 5 Dec 2008, 14:34,
archived)
Sorry, blame me having dated someone who worked for them
who was not exactly social services material. Also- the stories I used to hear....
( ,
Fri 5 Dec 2008, 14:38,
archived)
I'm sure a lot of them are complete tossers
- as are a lot of people.
I just think after this baby P thing there's a real chance for a complete over reaction which could ultimately put a lot of children (and people) at a higher risk.... I'm not sure 1 massive high profile cockup deserves the massive overreaction The Sun are going for.
( ,
Fri 5 Dec 2008, 14:42,
archived)
I just think after this baby P thing there's a real chance for a complete over reaction which could ultimately put a lot of children (and people) at a higher risk.... I'm not sure 1 massive high profile cockup deserves the massive overreaction The Sun are going for.