It says Dirty Mary, unless that's a porno starring Cameron Diaz with teh same hair as in the comedy
I thought the point was it was still called 'Finding Nemo', just done as the Jaws gob underneath the swimmer type thing.
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:46,
archived)
I take your point actually
i misread the instruction as including mashup the title.
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:51,
archived)
awww, don't be nice about it
now I feel like a cunt.
has anyone got a spare one?
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:52,
archived)
has anyone got a spare one?
To be honest...
I'm not adverse to the guidelines being bent as long as
a) some effort's gone into it
b) it's amusing
and
c) they don't pea in a new post
Two out of three aint bad
I'd rather things like this than just changing the name on a poster, which I fear will happen a lot, but its within the guidelines of the compo
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:52,
archived)
a) some effort's gone into it
b) it's amusing
and
c) they don't pea in a new post
Two out of three aint bad
I'd rather things like this than just changing the name on a poster, which I fear will happen a lot, but its within the guidelines of the compo
true
the actual shop job is rather well done, and I have failed to mention this in my mouth-frothing lust to correct minor perceived errors.
I shall correct this posthaste.
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:55,
archived)
I shall correct this posthaste.
I'm inclined to agree with you here
and to be fair, the word "mashup" in the title of the challenge is a little misleading. I know people should read the whole thing, but none of us are here because we have long attention spans, are we!
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:55,
archived)
plus mashup films was a previous challenge
so it encourages the peas
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:58,
archived)
Indeed it does
but any movie poster challenge is going to do that.
I am being unusually sanguine today, I must have swine flu or something.
( ,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 12:01,
archived)
I am being unusually sanguine today, I must have swine flu or something.