![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Explain Stuff With Maths"){kind=small}
Have a peroast
From the Explain Stuff With Maths challenge. See all 249 entries (closed)
(, Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:46, archived)
Pea in a new threadI'm disgusted
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:47,
archived)
Your disgusted!imagine how I felt!
* Not The Nine O'clock News quote
(* Not The Nine O'clock News quote
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:48,
archived)
R| ______/
R| /
R| /
R| /\/
R| /
R|/
R|______________
NNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Ttssattsr,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:50,
archived)
Would you be killing my d00ds too?I like bar charts.
( The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:56,
archived)
Six?I reckon the last one could easily escape. Hey, even the one behind him has a chance.
THIS GRAPH IS INCORRECT.
(THIS GRAPH IS INCORRECT.
Ttssattsr,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 10:59,
archived)
I figure the top of the bar might snap off when it hits the groundreducing the value to 5.
( The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 11:03,
archived)
I'm not sure I can accept that.You didn't even show your working.
( Ttssattsr,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 11:04,
archived)
It's making me imagine what the best strategy would be for 6 people catching a tall bar.On the one hand, you could all pile in at the base, trying to prevent it building any momentum.
Alternatively, you could take the risk of all spreading out, to try and catch it at once - but you would have to line up by height...
(Alternatively, you could take the risk of all spreading out, to try and catch it at once - but you would have to line up by height...
The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 11:08,
archived)
Whichever method you go for, once panic sets inyou're essentialy screwed.
( The magic of chutney Shakes it like an Instagram filter!,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 11:13,
archived)
