That's clearly not correct though.
I take no issue with the first part of that sentence.
But misused? Is there a more correct usage for "train station" than meaning "station for trains" such that using it as "station for trains" counts as misuse?
That's clearly just someone's opinion, and not an objective fact. So I have corrected it.
(, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:50, Share, Reply)
I don't really care either way
I was just amused that the page you produced as proof seemed to directly contradict you.
Edit: and now you've edited that page so that it doesn't? That's genius. I'd take my hat off to you were I the sort of cunt who wore one.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Wed 8 Nov 2017, 13:55,
Share,
Reply)