No.... you have the question wrong.
The "if not why not" bit is backwards. The onus is on you to say "if so, why". The default should be that you're allowed stuff until it's proven you shouldn't have it not the other way around.
Can you explain why this money should be taken from this guy, and crucially why all of your money shouldn't be taken from you.
(, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 18:35, Share, Reply)