b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Sex Toys » Post 1620038 | Search
This is a question Sex Toys

Lanternchikk asks "How about a vibrant and stimulating discussion on sex toys?" What do you use to get off, and has it ever gone wrong? And yes, we've heard that urban myth, thank you.

(, Thu 17 May 2012, 12:33)
Pages: Popular, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back

On the subject of sex...
Honestly what IS the big stigma attached to 'virginity' ?? I mean...throughout history and even religions now they don't half make a big deal of it. 'You must be a virgin to marry!' 'You WILL get 70 virgins in paradise!'
I vaguely remember my first sexual encounter; I just thought 'Oh I'v had sex now...well how about that' cleaned myself up then finished watching antiques roadshow.
(, Fri 18 May 2012, 22:30, 17 replies)
VIRGIN SPOTTED

(, Fri 18 May 2012, 22:45, closed)
it's because...
of continuing one's genetic heritage. And the sexual diseases.

Why have virgins in paradise? I'd rather have experienced girls. Maybe the hell the muslims go to have 70 slags continuously mocking their sexual inadequacies.
(, Fri 18 May 2012, 23:58, closed)
Is it a primitive thing ?
I'v never understood why there is so little emphasis of woman needing a man to be pure before marriage?
For example I used to work for a Moroccan muslim family. Once they where talking in their own language to the daughter and they where all laughing. I asked what the where laughing about and the father said ' where we come from woman only have husband, never boyfriend. Boy can have girlfriend though.' I'm presuming the joke was something along the lines of 'Your so pretty you will have no problem getting a boyfriend!' To which someone else said 'nonono, only husband! Im sending you to a convent! ' something along those lines.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 0:17, closed)
EDIT -
When I said 'is it a primitive thing' I meant is it a human characteristic that stems from primitive behavior.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 0:19, closed)
It's because male virgins over 16 are 30% more likely to commit sexual offences and join far right paramilitary groups than non-virgins of the same age.
This probability rises to 50% by 18 and to nearly 100% by 21, so if you don't get your end away as soon as you can you are basically a walking liability.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 1:12, closed)

Where did you get that info?
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 8:49, closed)
A post-normal scientist told me.

(, Sat 19 May 2012, 18:13, closed)
fuck off back to virginsnet.

(, Sat 19 May 2012, 7:30, closed)
It's only important to those who fear comparison.

(, Sat 19 May 2012, 9:41, closed)
See, we know you're lying.
Because there's no mention of the old guy giving you a Werther's afterwards.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 10:13, closed)
Antiques Roadshow?
It was my Mum wasn't it.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 10:19, closed)
it was your dad.
He promised to get me a kitten :(03
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 10:28, closed)
The 'stigma' isn't about men losing their 'V' plates
it's about women losing theirs, increasing the possibility that the man is spending his resources bringing up another man's child.

This is why in some cultures, the bedsheet from the honeymoon night is / was hung outside the house to prove that the woman was a virgin. Whereas the man would be encouraged to 'sow his wild oats' - presumably to give him a taste for The Sex which would then make him desire marriage, i.e. sex on tap (hollow laugh). And thus society / our species perpetuates itself.

We're basically all in thrall of our biology - women don't want men to be unfaithful, in case they father a child and have to divert resources to that child. Men don't want women to be unfaithful in case they have to raise a child who isn't of their genetic stock. These are very primeval impulses...

...the gays ? God knows - I often think they have the right idea, and good on them.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 13:00, closed)

But mathematically it doesn't work out. Who are the men having premarital sex with before their virgin wives, as those woman would then be deemed ineligible there after. Whores? So if some woman are unable to marry as they are ineligible, then that decreases the amount of eligible woman for wives for the men. So that means some men go without ever having a wife. Because the population is half female, half male. This honestly baffled me. Is like to get my head around it.
(, Sat 19 May 2012, 19:29, closed)
The whole point behind a 'survival of the genes' attitude towards sex
as is demonstrated to this day, is that not all genes survive. Not all men will be 'worthy' enough to get the virgin bride. Not all women will possess the attributes that make men want to reproduce with them. For it to work out completely 50/50, this implies that *everyone* is getting some sex, and God knows any experience on this planet should prove that to be a fallacy !
(, Sun 20 May 2012, 12:45, closed)
Now I see what you're saying.
I found out recently why its more difficult to make a woman orgasm compared to a man. It all comes down to woman needing an attentive partner that is more likely to stick around for her during pregnancy and child rearing.
After wondering about that for some time!
(, Mon 21 May 2012, 17:03, closed)
That sounds dangerously close to evolutionary psychology.
Which is pretty much uniformly bollocks. Be wary.
(, Wed 23 May 2012, 10:16, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Popular, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1