b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10094010 (Thread)

# that's what I love* about b3ta, people read something and believe it
and then keep it going and going and going. Like my having won every image challenge b3ta has ever done.
It was a joke, note the compo'ing of it, I was also posting things in other threads at the same time, no one flounced there.

*hate
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:53, archived)
# I guessed you were joking
You're too fluffy to flounce :)
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:55, archived)
# I've flounced before
but not in a quitting way. I'm always getting wound up :)
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:57, archived)
# *issues Emergency Kittin*
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:59, archived)
# AW
*sleeps*
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:55, archived)
# so what you hate about b3ta is summed up by this challenge then?
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:56, archived)
# I'm still confused as to who'd puppet we're being with this one :D
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:57, archived)
#
Possibly Rob's? Was a hint of 'I'll be able to get paid for two hours' work on the site again' but I'm new here so unsure. EDIT Oh ok.
(, Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:59, archived)
# expose 'em for who they are
corporate fucks like the rest.....we willing to promote them on b3ta?
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:03, archived)
# "promote" isn't the word I'd use
They very likely know they're as much a target for the cynical satirists of b3ta as anyone. Smart bunch, b3tans, they can see through a fair amount of corporate BS.

If Rob can make a few quid off them, then I say go for it. It's his site, he has bills to pay, and this site has given me plenty of fun for minimal cost (apart from the wasted years... sigh).
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:11, archived)
# ^^
I was about to type pretty much the same. If you don't like it, move on to the next challenge or make something else from scratch.

Edit: like I have to do with nearly every image challenge.
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:15, archived)
# tear into them seems to be the message....fine by me
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:26, archived)
# it doesn't make them right though :/
but, ok. carry on.
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:56, archived)
# I'm not having a go at anybody, or saying anyone's a puppet
just the automatic criticism of nuclear energy, when it's neither based on fact nor science, is a bit useless. It just smells of jumping on a nuclear-bashing bandwagon without considering the actual statistics and SCIENCE behind it all. Again, not accusing anyone of puppetry, just that the principle of the challenge seems a little ignorant of the truth.
(, Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:51, archived)