I would suggestthat whether 'cunt' or 'cloaca' is employed, the personal attacks are utterly pointless. Personal attacks, as dissenting voices, are self-defeating. Surely the wisest option would be to provide intellectual opposition to his viewpoints, with persuasive evidence of why he is wrong, rather than calling him a cloaca.
I fear that this plays into his hands somewhat, as he can easily reject these 'criticisms' by putting it down to childish name-calling. I think he would be much more uncomfortable with reasoned arguments against him. This just gives him the opportunity to play the victim, if anything comes of it.
(I fear that this plays into his hands somewhat, as he can easily reject these 'criticisms' by putting it down to childish name-calling. I think he would be much more uncomfortable with reasoned arguments against him. This just gives him the opportunity to play the victim, if anything comes of it.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:10,
archived)
I doubt I would have got very farin instructing b3tans in how to do anything. I'd sonner attempt the herding of cats.
(
Manic can teach you the secret of fire,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 11:21,
archived)
I'm not accusing you of instructingand you know I'm a fan of bloggerheads and your work in general. I'm just concerned about the efficacy of the current tactic.
( drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Thu 24 Jun 2010, 12:23,
archived)