I would have been short by 1/3, not 1/4.that s if I had written 6*3, which of course I never did and I have no idea what you are talking about, no-siree, not me.
(
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 14 Aug 2013, 13:51,
archived)
Home » Messageboard »
Message 10995673
(Thread)
I would have been short by 1/3, not 1/4.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 14 Aug 2013, 13:51,
archived)
I would have been short by 1/3, not 1/4. LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Wed 14 Aug 2013, 13:51,
archived)