I'm really suprisedthe spambots haven't figured out a way to pick that sort of encoding up...
(
kitty meow meow,
Fri 27 Jun 2003, 21:04,
archived)
its quite hard to parse natural languagebesides i have a hotmail spam filter, every email to it gets deleted
(,
Fri 27 Jun 2003, 21:05,
archived)
I knowbut it wouldn't be that difficult I think
to pickup xxx at hotmail.com
you wouldn't catch all of it, but you could catch some of the more common ones like hotmail and yahoo, etc
then again, you might get too many false results for it to be worth your time
(to pickup xxx at hotmail.com
you wouldn't catch all of it, but you could catch some of the more common ones like hotmail and yahoo, etc
then again, you might get too many false results for it to be worth your time
kitty meow meow,
Fri 27 Jun 2003, 21:06,
archived)
think of how many timesthe shitty service at hotmail.com would get signed up... or the terrible spam filters @ yahoo.com
:D
(:D
JustHere4Coffee remembers when all o' this were car parks,
Fri 27 Jun 2003, 21:10,
archived)