b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The Reductionist Challenge » Message 2263221

[challenge entry] The Cabinet


Left to right: Blunkett, Brown, Blair, Prescott, Straw.

From the The Reductionist Challenge challenge. See all 1013 entries (closed)

(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:04, archived)
# I think
Brown needs to lose the jawline and have curlier hair.

But it's terribly woo nonetheless.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:04, archived)
# I think you're right - this needs a little more work
But thank you. This was tremendous fun to do.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:06, archived)
# the blair one
and the straw one am De Bestest - beautifully refined down. :)
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:07, archived)
# I never realised what a gloomy bunch
Then, when I tried to picture their salient features in my head, I had 3/5 of them frowning. And Straw looking sinister.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:09, archived)
# i can't see a picture...
is that intentional and a statement too clever for me to understand, or can i just not load msn pictures at the moment? either way, i feel like i'm missing out!

edit: got it now. yay! ignore me :)
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:17, archived)
# Boo :(
There's a pic there, and dead good it is too

:(

edit: rah!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:19, archived)
# hahahahahahah
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:04, archived)
# I heard IDS
on the radio this morning, he sounded much happier than he did last week. Almost chipper, in fact. Thought I should mention.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:07, archived)
# he also said
"anyone who wants my old job is mad"

which made me chuckle a bit
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:08, archived)
# And 100% correct
on current showing too.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:10, archived)
# I'll do it.
It'd be a laugh.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:10, archived)
# you
probably have a better chance to be honest
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:12, archived)
# I think I have the required qualifications.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# I think
you're possibly over qualified for the job really.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:15, archived)
# I'd love to be the boss of the Tory party
but I'd be worried that I'd do a better job than the real Tories
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:22, archived)
# It'd be the end of civilisation,
I reckon.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:16, archived)
# Political madness
There is an argument that goes:

Politicians have to be good at lying in order to succeed.
Lying is symptomatic of some mental disorders.
The politicians that rise to the top of the political ladder are the best liars.
Therefore they are the craziest.

Ian and Duncan Smith are right.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:16, archived)
# hello sir
my brother has made a possibly interesting discovery...

have you seen the new PS2 adverts, with a plotline that's extremely reminiscent of your Crazy Paving animation?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:10, archived)
# Yes.
It's too basic an idea to be copyrightable, and the anim itself is totally original.
Cheers for thinking of me though.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# that's what we thought
but if you did inspire it, then at least it shows your work's getting noticed I suppose! :)

oh, on a tangent, are you related to AndyK here on the board? I saw him in the distance on friday and almost thought you'd made it down without bringing Phil!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:15, archived)
# Er.
No I'm not related, but yes I was there. Wearing a name badge that I nicked off Andy K after he left. Er. Sorry.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:18, archived)
# pah
cheating swine!

still, at least I now don't feel so stupid for almost mistaking someone else for you
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:22, archived)
# *pssst*
He was there you know........
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:19, archived)
# he looks nowt like him!
Does he?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:19, archived)
# Spanky was on earlier
and i looked in his profile to find a pic of himself.

I now understand the confusion.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:22, archived)
# I really can't apologise enough
for that time I was drunk and thought you really were him while you stood in front of me looking affronted.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:23, archived)
# no apologies required m'dear, i just thought there was a conspiracy ;-)
the first time i met 100% Kitten she greeted me with "OI, i've got a bone to pick with you" cos she also thought i was he.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:39, archived)
# these kinds of people
always seem nicer when they're out of a job
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:10, archived)
# yay
thank you.
My mum was listening too, and she even reckoned a few things he said sounded a bit lefty.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:11, archived)
# PINKO!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# and one for you...


:D
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:12, archived)
# Perfect.
I never liked him.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# ...
still looks as handsome as ever..

Also thanks again for all the stuff you let me use, apparently there will be photographic evidence soon..
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:14, archived)
# I saw Bove on Saturday and saw the finished article
it was Most Woo and I was v. impressed!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:19, archived)
# Aceness. Woo!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:05, archived)
# nice!
prescott's the best one

and here's Blunkett's hamster
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:05, archived)
# hahaha
excellent
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:07, archived)
# *giggles inanely*
vat ish velly velly good.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:08, archived)
# dat
am cracking!

[edit]May I?

(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# hahaha
didn't think of that

(blimey, I seem to have been FP'd - hoorah!)
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:18, archived)
# another fine example
of the advantages of reposting
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:20, archived)
# yes
very pleased - 3rd time lucky.

perhaps your alphabet too?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:22, archived)
# I wouldn't push it.
:)
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:25, archived)
# hee hee
woo to both pics
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:22, archived)
# That's really really well done.
Hoopla!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 22:26, archived)
# Gets my
vote

woo!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:05, archived)
# very good
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:05, archived)
# ooooh
vay good :)
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:06, archived)
# that's ace^2
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:06, archived)
# blunkett's
an unpleasant gentleman.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:08, archived)
# Woah, sparky!
This man is downgrading dope.

See that Michael Howard? He really WAS an unpleasant gentleman as Home Sec. A twunt is what he was. A twunt.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:09, archived)
# they're both
spunts.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:10, archived)
# You really have no idea, do you?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:13, archived)
# but DB's
introducing some fairly dodgy anti-immigration laws
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:16, archived)
# What do you think it was like living, working and voting under the Tories?
Hmmm? Nirvana?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:17, archived)
# i don't think
he's trying to say the Tories were any better.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:19, archived)
# True.
But people need to learn that the Tories are nasty bastards who want power back, and they'll even use (and I use the term advisedly) gay and black candidates to try to regain it. They were, are and always will be nasty, selfish twunts.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:23, archived)
# no I agree
the Tories are far worse!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:26, archived)
# Am I?
(, Thu 6 Nov 2003, 9:49, archived)
# The Poll Tax.
Section 28.
Both ™ M. Howard Esq.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:20, archived)
# Y'know...
...that's really very good.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2003, 21:08, archived)