Who says fluff and cowboys don't mix?
Comments welcome, as ever :)
From the cowboys challenge. See all 388 entries (closed)
( , Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:31, archived)
Comments welcome, as ever :)
From the cowboys challenge. See all 388 entries (closed)
( , Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:31, archived)
'tis good
but it looks as though you stretched the gun and hat images. It is far better to shrink the background image (the cat) than to stretch something else.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:33,
archived)
Actually
I had to shrink and rotate the gun, hat and belt. Does the same principle apply? Also - cheers!
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:34,
archived)
No.
As i said, shrinkage is better. But did you blur the gun and hat? They look out of place with the rest.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:37,
archived)
They seemed
to go fuzzy when I rotated them, not sure if I have some kind of feathering on by default or if they don't fit well with the background. Slighly related point - are shadows hard or easy in PSP?
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:39,
archived)
easy-ish
i used psp8 for a while.
Drop shadows etc. can be put on a different layer from the picture generating the shadow, so you can erase bits you don't want without affecting the main pic.
EDIT - When you rotate or distort images in psp the image is blurred as you alter it, but when you apply the transformation it should sharpen back up again.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2004, 21:42,
archived)
Drop shadows etc. can be put on a different layer from the picture generating the shadow, so you can erase bits you don't want without affecting the main pic.
EDIT - When you rotate or distort images in psp the image is blurred as you alter it, but when you apply the transformation it should sharpen back up again.