I find this odd.
I'm not an 'I would'er.
I was in college in the US for almost all of the nineties, and even as a product of that hothouse of constant anti-penile browbeating, I can't figure a rational standard under which commenting favorably (or ironically) on the attractiveness (or not) of a picture of a woman (or vampire, or dalek, or the blue thing in 'Cap'n Biscuit') qualifies as misogynistic.
I also can't come up with a reading of 'Even if you would, she probably wouldn't' that isn't misandric.
The FAQ is a self-hating hypocrite. (It does have a man's name.)
( ,
Tue 7 Dec 2004, 22:50,
archived)
I'm not an 'I would'er.
I was in college in the US for almost all of the nineties, and even as a product of that hothouse of constant anti-penile browbeating, I can't figure a rational standard under which commenting favorably (or ironically) on the attractiveness (or not) of a picture of a woman (or vampire, or dalek, or the blue thing in 'Cap'n Biscuit') qualifies as misogynistic.
I also can't come up with a reading of 'Even if you would, she probably wouldn't' that isn't misandric.
The FAQ is a self-hating hypocrite. (It does have a man's name.)