well if it's mostly boolean
then you should be fine for hundreds probably even thousands of rows.
(
dazzla - Just blew up his shuttle and potentially lost all pr0n,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:46,
archived)
grand stuff...
*prepares unnesecarily long select statements*
(
lemony,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:49,
archived)
rows or columns...?!
don`t do thousands of columns (fields man... use the correct term!), whether or not the database supports it
(
Reckless_Rik,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 11:55,
archived)
arse
i did actually mean rows, thousands of fields (thanks for the correction) would be hideous to use.
(
dazzla - Just blew up his shuttle and potentially lost all pr0n,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 12:04,
archived)
Technically attributes
and tuples instead of rows
/splitting hairs
(
dingochutney *parp*,
Wed 2 Feb 2005, 12:07,
archived)