If it were my work which were being praised,
I would infinitely prefer to receive a reply which a little thought had been put into.
People 'woo yay' everything, so it's meaningless.
( Comma, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:31, archived)

That's true,
but I think it still quite obviously means niceness and congratulations. You have to try quite hard to feel any other way about getting 'woo/yay'-ed, and there doesn't seem much point frankly.
( grey kid is breakdancing to save a community centre, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:37, archived)

personally

If I post some work I want quantity replies :)
( Attila the Bun is not in a right cunt of a mood, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:39, archived)

Over
quality? Backs up the woo/yay argument then.
( grey kid is breakdancing to save a community centre, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:41, archived)

Absolutely

More WYs
More FPs


I'm an FP whore


as you can tell by the amount I've had :)
( Attila the Bun is not in a right cunt of a mood, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:43, archived)

Personally,
when I post a picture I want people to look at it and think a little about what they're saying, rather than replying with the same thing that they've replied to every other post with.
( Comma, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:43, archived)

i rarely get wooyay-ed but i'm happy when i do.
it doesn't make the pic any better or worse,if i thought the pic was crap i wouldn't post it it the first place.
( Mstandot, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:39, archived)

Oh, it is nice and congratulatory,
but answers that have been thought about are worth more and are better-remembered.
( Comma, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:40, archived)

Agreed.
What pulchritudinous points we BOTH make. :)
( grey kid is breakdancing to save a community centre, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:41, archived)

You make very
cromulent points, that I hope shall embiggen us all.
( Chrico is a bounder and a cad, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:43, archived)

Utterly resplendent, I'd say.

( Comma, Mon 4 Jul 2005, 0:44, archived)