number 1 and 7 are technically incorrect (as enforeced as strict rules anyhow)
Images don't have to be that physical size or under - many regulars post pics larger and nothing is said.
And on point number 7 - posting links on the links board is only a suggestion, not a requirement.
So ner.
EDIT: and... NING!
/grumpy blog
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:45,
archived)
And on point number 7 - posting links on the links board is only a suggestion, not a requirement.
So ner.
EDIT: and... NING!
/grumpy blog
Did it say they had to be that size?
And 7 was added by request:P
'ning matey.
EDIT: But I reverted to the original.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:48,
archived)
'ning matey.
EDIT: But I reverted to the original.
well yeah you did. 'Images should be no bigger than this one'
well, you actually said it in cat speak but I can't be arsed to type like that.
BUM BUM BUM BUHNsrewmgfvsfvsfdrokfdgsfd/
Meh. I'm off already - no time for b3ta today.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:50,
archived)
BUM BUM BUM BUHNsrewmgfvsfvsfdrokfdgsfd/
Meh. I'm off already - no time for b3ta today.
oooh that's hazy english accuracy
it's forceful but as you say, not definite.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:56,
archived)
^this
250k is the written limit for anims, but pics are only suggested to be this low. More than 75k is staring to push it if you ask me.
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:53,
archived)
Well I don't think he minds as long as he gets the kippers and cuddelz
( ,
Tue 27 Feb 2007, 8:55,
archived)