Seriously thoughan analogy which occurs to me is of young children standing around in a playground, heatedly discussing the definition of fun. I'd rather just play.
That's not to say that I'm anti-intellectual, or non-intellectual, but the idea of categorization, which is really what's being discussed here, is not really that interesting to me personally, particuarly since it all comes down to nothing more than personal opinion, however forcably that opinion is expressed, or however conventionally 'correct' it is currently considered.
(That's not to say that I'm anti-intellectual, or non-intellectual, but the idea of categorization, which is really what's being discussed here, is not really that interesting to me personally, particuarly since it all comes down to nothing more than personal opinion, however forcably that opinion is expressed, or however conventionally 'correct' it is currently considered.
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 5:39,
archived)
Definitions are unimportantbut things need explaining. In the case of art I see a dodging of an explanation.
I'm also interested in what fun is, by the way, because that's also difficult to explain -
meaningfully, fruitfully difficult, not just intractable.
Brilliant.Great. That's the point. And when we say that we accept everything with an open mind and don't reject out of hand. That sounds like what you're saying and it sounds like we're arguing from the same precept. But, to return to the point, that's not cubism.
(,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 5:44,
archived)
I AM ONE POSITIVE MOTHERFUCKER.
gronkpan https://twitter.com/VomitingLarry,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 5:55,
archived)
WE'RE OFF THE PAGE.I AM SO ENGORGED RIGHT NOW.
( mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ,
Wed 26 Dec 2007, 5:56,
archived)