so you're suggesting that the growth in things can be calucated by2*c
c=change
edit - sorry - that's completely wrong, the number of 'things is 2*c, the growth of things is c
(c=change
edit - sorry - that's completely wrong, the number of 'things is 2*c, the growth of things is c
Prof UnderCover evitable,
Thu 13 Mar 2008, 11:51,
archived)
As there are no numbers on the axes its impossible to say*Lecturer*
(,
Thu 13 Mar 2008, 11:56,
archived)
poppycockif the number of things which stay the same is equal to the number of things which change, then the number of things must grow by change (indeed - doubling every 'time') ... shirley - or am I being dense again?
( Prof UnderCover evitable,
Thu 13 Mar 2008, 12:01,
archived)