...
From the The Censorship Challenge challenge. See all 503 entries (closed)
( , Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:33, archived)
From the The Censorship Challenge challenge. See all 503 entries (closed)
( , Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:33, archived)
Please rate the evening.
"I'd give her 1. Hurhurhur."
edit: Wait, I think I'm mixing up shows. What's the one where they each mess up a dinner, get drunk and then bitch about each other in taxis?
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:35,
archived)
edit: Wait, I think I'm mixing up shows. What's the one where they each mess up a dinner, get drunk and then bitch about each other in taxis?
It is? Oh good.
I thought I was mixing it up with that one where a bunch of E-listers go to a swanky dinner and we watch them chatting.
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:44,
archived)
i don't understand these 'food' shows
eating is not a spectator sport (unless you're a supermodel)
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:45,
archived)
everyone's too busy watching cookery shows to actually do any cooking
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 16:55,
archived)
A lot of people say that these days.
It's completely untrue mind, but it gets a laugh. I've learned a lot from cookery shows, and tried many of the things I see on TV - which I wouldn't have thought of trying had I not seen it on TV.
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:05,
archived)
I spent 490 hours watching Saturday Kitchen on Saturday
and I only had time to eat my socks afterwards
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:21,
archived)
No, you were right.
There's a celebrity version of this terrible show.
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:04,
archived)
it was definitely a different show.
They didn't cook for each other, they were in a restaurant, at two-to-four seat tables, I think.
Anyway, it matters not.
( ,
Tue 20 Oct 2009, 17:20,
archived)
Anyway, it matters not.