an election and referendum are two very different things
a referendum is actually not binding.
EDIT: CHRIST, it's like people are just prepared to get passionate about facts that they haven't bothered to research... what does that remind me of... oh yes, what got us into this clusterfuck in the process.
googling exists... try doing with your thoughts opinions and facts, and then you can do the bare fucking minimum required to not go around spouting off non-sense.
The age of arrogance "i think it there for it's right" where facts are the constant casualty.
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 16:52, Share, Reply)
a referendum is actually not binding.
EDIT: CHRIST, it's like people are just prepared to get passionate about facts that they haven't bothered to research... what does that remind me of... oh yes, what got us into this clusterfuck in the process.
googling exists... try doing with your thoughts opinions and facts, and then you can do the bare fucking minimum required to not go around spouting off non-sense.
The age of arrogance "i think it there for it's right" where facts are the constant casualty.
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 16:52, Share, Reply)
A referendum might not be binding but
having another one and another one and another one and ... etc until you get the result you desire is in no way democratic. The UK population were told that if the vote leave succedes then Article 50 will be put in motion. If it isn't the EU could try to kick us out using Article 7 stating there was a breach of democratic principles.
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:20, Share, Reply)
having another one and another one and another one and ... etc until you get the result you desire is in no way democratic. The UK population were told that if the vote leave succedes then Article 50 will be put in motion. If it isn't the EU could try to kick us out using Article 7 stating there was a breach of democratic principles.
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:20, Share, Reply)
They were also told that £350m/week would be added to the NHS budget
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:22, Share, Reply)
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:22, Share, Reply)
Splitting hairs much?
If the rules get changed retrospectively, the vast majority of the people who voted won't care about the technical difference between an election and a referendum. They'll just see that a political elite who they barely trust asked them what they wanted, then gave them the opposite.
What do you think would be the result?
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:39, Share, Reply)
If the rules get changed retrospectively, the vast majority of the people who voted won't care about the technical difference between an election and a referendum. They'll just see that a political elite who they barely trust asked them what they wanted, then gave them the opposite.
What do you think would be the result?
( , Sun 26 Jun 2016, 17:39, Share, Reply)