b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 2043097

# New challenge

Conjoined Celebrities


What's better than one celebrity?
Two joined mercilessly together,
that's what. Grab two people whose
names go together and shop them so
they look stupid, like Roger Moorgan
Freeman
here.

Extra points for making them funny, folks.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:48, archived)
# jolly good
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:48, archived)
# woo
that i likes :-)
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:49, archived)
[challenge entry] Piss poor repost

But I'm at school sans photoshop.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:50, archived)
# Ooooh, first entry
And it's not even really two celebs...
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:54, archived)
# I don't know
I think you reposted it wuite well.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:58, archived)
# If it's going to be bad
Then at least it was first :)
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:59, archived)
# surely making them funny
should be compulsory, not a bonus point winning extra? ;)
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:50, archived)
# I
voted it was picked, I'm glowing inside

and pissed off that I can't psp working
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:50, archived)
# I'd like to apologise to whoever suggested "mixed metaphors"
I voted for it, and the ones I vote for never, ever win.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:54, archived)
# someone
once suggested that Billy Bragg should have been made to play a tory party conferences for the exact same reason
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:55, archived)
# Just like
'Split Personalities' in Private Eye, yes?
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:50, archived)
# no,
because they're all nobbers
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:52, archived)
# true.
there all gay
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:54, archived)
# interesting
grammar, like your but for they're
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:56, archived)
# Guess what?
That's the joke!

pfft
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:57, archived)
# really
I would have never guessed

/sarcasm off
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:58, archived)
# their all gay - Ed
Conjugate!

My all gay
His all gay
Her all gay
Our all gay
Their all gay
Your all gay
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:58, archived)
# Good point.
Well put.

Damn, damn, damn.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 13:01, archived)
# wow
that works. Well done.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 13:01, archived)
# their's no rule
say's you of got to do it that way
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 13:01, archived)
# Well fine
let's just open the door to grammatic anarchy
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 13:05, archived)
# Mindpiss.
Sorry.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:55, archived)
# Top compage.
got to go think about this.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:51, archived)
# good comp
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:54, archived)
# better than last
weeks certainly
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:55, archived)
# Isn't this already a cartoon in Private Eye?
Split Personalities, I think it's called.
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:55, archived)
# so what?
Private eye does funny cartoons as well, should we stop doing those?
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:56, archived)
# Private Eye does funny cartoons?
Not since 1974 ...
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:57, archived)
# i thought we did
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:58, archived)
# well you do
for sure :)
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:59, archived)
# Yay!
I did it!
(, Fri 26 Sep 2003, 12:58, archived)