From the c4 Alternative Xmas challenge. See all 819 entries (closed)
( , Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:08, archived)
this sucks so much
"Channel 4 has contacted b3ta and asked us to ask you to "re-design the C4 logo to promote their 'alternative Christmas'."
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:11,
archived)
I still don't
get exactly what they mean by redesign. Do they want a brand new style of logo, or do they just want some graphics or animations incorporating the 4-logo?
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:14,
archived)
my guess is the second
preferably christmas related, since that's what it asks for
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:15,
archived)
i'm guessing the second one.
if they wanted a new logo, they'd hire an absurdly expensive image consultant to change the 4 to comic sans
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:15,
archived)
they want it tilted
and made out of random colors.
or maybe not tilted at all.
their christmases are really alternative.
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:16,
archived)
or maybe not tilted at all.
their christmases are really alternative.
Well, quite..
And nothing says christmas like a brand spanking new brown and pink colour scheme. I'm sure they'll snap it up. Money in the bank..
pffft
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:14,
archived)
pffft
we can but hope..
but I sorely doubt it. How I long for the days of badly drawn cock.
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:18,
archived)
oh hang on..
is it "a biting satirical sideswipe at the lack of originality in the challenge"?
Or not.
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:14,
archived)
Or not.
Well, if it is..
it's more of a gummy suckerpunch-line in the vague direction of the lack of originality..
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:17,
archived)
yeah
i think that's what it is.
given that the filename is "rud."
which is pretty clever.
but the pink one is confusing me, too.
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:20,
archived)
given that the filename is "rud."
which is pretty clever.
but the pink one is confusing me, too.
I didn't say it was *his* cock...
but yes, there is frequently a cock in that general position. It takes a lot of encouragement to get a fat man down a chimney.
( ,
Tue 16 Nov 2004, 1:24,
archived)