I think there's been some great stuff.....it's just not very image-based. And is thus easier to create for.
I don't have a problem with it... variety is good. I just think we should spin it the other way this week and go for a pure image effort.
(I don't have a problem with it... variety is good. I just think we should spin it the other way this week and go for a pure image effort.
chaotic_illuminator proud spacehopperist,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 14:24,
archived)
maybei like the pure image stuff to be honest.
some of the captions have been excellent. fairdos :)
(some of the captions have been excellent. fairdos :)
mnb098mnb used to be here,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 14:25,
archived)
oh noI don't have a problem with it, I couldn't decide what company to slag off! it's a generic compo entry.
the text at the bottom seems a bit harsh though, I should remove that really..
(the text at the bottom seems a bit harsh though, I should remove that really..
munkt0n,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 14:27,
archived)
I like it...similar thinking to mine at
www.b3ta.com/board/648063
(www.b3ta.com/board/648063
chaotic_illuminator proud spacehopperist,
Wed 15 Jan 2003, 14:32,
archived)