er
no, it means the exception that test whether the rule is correct or not.
but.
but, that doesn't make sense. hmmm.
( ,
Thu 5 Apr 2007, 15:01,
archived)
but.
but, that doesn't make sense. hmmm.
The exception
(to the usual course of things) might sometimes prove (or provide evidence for) the rule as well. This would strengthen the rule.
( ,
Thu 5 Apr 2007, 15:05,
archived)
so, what
Still not following.
Rule: BMW drivers are wankers
Exception: Man X is not a wanker and owns one.
Surely that means the rule is defeated?
( ,
Thu 5 Apr 2007, 15:07,
archived)
Rule: BMW drivers are wankers
Exception: Man X is not a wanker and owns one.
Surely that means the rule is defeated?
But surely an exception by definition
is an instance or case not conforming to the general rule.
So If you try test a rule with an exception, the rule will always fail
( ,
Thu 5 Apr 2007, 15:05,
archived)
So If you try test a rule with an exception, the rule will always fail