that story really is a cause for culling of certain members of the human race
I repeat my comment from earlier and hope he is gang raped to death in prison.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 9:53,
archived)
I have to agree,
although you are still a shit nosed fuck monkey.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:33,
archived)
i love you
you're the most fascist liberal i have ever come across :)
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 9:56,
archived)
I'm so good I'm bad
no, just Karmic, he did utter evil, so I hope Karma comes round and does the same to him.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:08,
archived)
Oh I see
You support a death penalty so long as it's imposed by karma.
Though technically I suppose "doing the same to him" would mean karma pissing on him a bit and spraying him with shaving foam.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:11,
archived)
Though technically I suppose "doing the same to him" would mean karma pissing on him a bit and spraying him with shaving foam.
no, I don;t support the death penalty
it's too complex an issue to get involved in.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:15,
archived)
The problem with that statement is
that karma should be able to do that without your wishing it.
This means that you are wishing pure evil onto somebody else and karma may well bite you in the arse for it.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:11,
archived)
This means that you are wishing pure evil onto somebody else and karma may well bite you in the arse for it.
someone will wish something on me
I think I've had that before and will no doubt have it again in my life.
Luckily, in my experience just wishinjg something doesn't make it happen.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:14,
archived)
Luckily, in my experience just wishinjg something doesn't make it happen.
Might do
if you're wishing with your flies open while holding a can of shaving foam.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:17,
archived)
i totaly understand your viewpoint
i don't fully agree with it, but i understand it
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:17,
archived)
Hahahaha
Politics is never easy. I'm a sort of mildly right-wing liberal socialist.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:18,
archived)
He'd smoked
a "cannabis joint", so he was bound to do something like this.
Cannabis should be illegal.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 9:58,
archived)
Cannabis should be illegal.
hahaha, i noticed that too
the media fuckers always go for the easy explanation
I'll bet he played "Killer Games" too
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:02,
archived)
I'll bet he played "Killer Games" too
o rly?
thanks for the rape, but dont bogart that doobie.
*tokes*
*surfs*
*rape-kills*
drugs are a vicious circle.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:09,
archived)
*tokes*
*surfs*
*rape-kills*
drugs are a vicious circle.
Oh.
Did Mr. Bailey pick up on that one? Hurrah for him and his, er, musical hair.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:12,
archived)
Thank you
I must say I was quite speechless after reading the news article, but your answer covers it nicely
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 9:58,
archived)
fucking hell
you're absolutely correct. that's one of the most shocking things I've read in a while. I wonder what his /board username is...
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:03,
archived)
I've been asking for a cull for a long time.
I'm glad I hate most of the human race.
/not emo just strong ideology(sp?) blog
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:03,
archived)
/not emo just strong ideology(sp?) blog
I'm with you to an extent, but if we're going to better the human race and preserve our gene pool
the retards and the disabled folk should probably go first. For the greater good.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:03,
archived)
Hey, I wasn't the one that suggested we start exterminating people.
I would eat soylent green though.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:10,
archived)
followed by anyone who needs glasses
the average eyesight is already bad enough as it is
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:10,
archived)
don't bung them all in together fella :)
I've worked with enough kind hearted and mentally superior disabled folk in my time.
Just because someone doesn't have the use of their legs doesn't mean they can't create the most incredible work of art or write the greatest piece of literature.
But I'm talking about the eradication of evil. Which I'm pretty certain you can't do because you then have nothing to qualify good against, and once you've got rid of the really evil ones then people wnat to get rid of the slightly evil, then the "bit arsey" ones, then the ones that borrowed your screwdriver for too long, etc etc
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:13,
archived)
Just because someone doesn't have the use of their legs doesn't mean they can't create the most incredible work of art or write the greatest piece of literature.
But I'm talking about the eradication of evil. Which I'm pretty certain you can't do because you then have nothing to qualify good against, and once you've got rid of the really evil ones then people wnat to get rid of the slightly evil, then the "bit arsey" ones, then the ones that borrowed your screwdriver for too long, etc etc
Some might suggest
that the eradicators of evil are committing an evil act.
Kind of like how it's ok for an army to murder thousands of people because their government did the same thing.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:16,
archived)
Kind of like how it's ok for an army to murder thousands of people because their government did the same thing.
very much so
you become as bad as your enemy and all that, which is why I hypothesise these things and would never consider acting on them myself.
I don't even kill flies, I let them out the window :D
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:17,
archived)
I don't even kill flies, I let them out the window :D
and what if evil is not genetically determined
or if evil is so multigenic that virtually every person has a gene associated with increased "evilness" risk?
BTW: the second scenario is true for most conditions, so you'd have to exterminate the entire humaan race to get rid of retards from our gene pool. Not that I'm against that.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:19,
archived)
BTW: the second scenario is true for most conditions, so you'd have to exterminate the entire humaan race to get rid of retards from our gene pool. Not that I'm against that.
OF COURSE evil is not genetically determined.
What do you think brains are for, if not forming evil plans?
Odd how this kind of discussion suckers me into jokes that suggest the doctrine of original sin, bless the innocent little animals for they are incapable of evil, etc.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:29,
archived)
Odd how this kind of discussion suckers me into jokes that suggest the doctrine of original sin, bless the innocent little animals for they are incapable of evil, etc.
TO PERFORM THE TURKEY CURSE:
Take a foot stance as if you were John L. Sullivan preparing for fisticuffs. Face the particular greyfaced you wish to short-circuit, or towards the direction of the negative aneristic vibration that you wish to neutralize. Begin waving your arms in any elaborate manner and make motions with your hands as though you were Mandrake feeling up a sexy giantess. Chant, loudly and clearly:
GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE!
The results will be instantly apparent.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:19,
archived)
GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE, GOBBLE!
The results will be instantly apparent.
Sadly
this sort of behaviour is hard-wired into our brains from our genetic legacy. So yes, a cull to eradicate the bastards would be lovely but I think it would make us a completely different species, like cattle or something.
It's the job of our modern society to keep a check on this sort of thing, but there are just too many people in the world, and the type of society we evolved for just doesn't work any more.
The only solution I can think of is to get rid of reality TV, ITV, Nuts & Zoo and their like and all of the drivel out there that glorifies this kind of twatty behaviour.
Or if you have a problem with freedom of speech, publish them but only sell them to people who will read them because it's 'ironic'. Yes, Oxbridge students!
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:20,
archived)
It's the job of our modern society to keep a check on this sort of thing, but there are just too many people in the world, and the type of society we evolved for just doesn't work any more.
The only solution I can think of is to get rid of reality TV, ITV, Nuts & Zoo and their like and all of the drivel out there that glorifies this kind of twatty behaviour.
Or if you have a problem with freedom of speech, publish them but only sell them to people who will read them because it's 'ironic'. Yes, Oxbridge students!
Creativity, imagination, ideas, language
= the capacity to piss on an dying woman in the street.
Actually, wait, that's not quite right; I bet all kinds of species of animal have done similar things. They just don't have newspapers to report it, or any sense of decency to be outraged.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:42,
archived)
Actually, wait, that's not quite right; I bet all kinds of species of animal have done similar things. They just don't have newspapers to report it, or any sense of decency to be outraged.
I've always wondered if other animals are capable of having a sense of outrage.
I'd love to see giraffes doing it.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:47,
archived)
Chimps routinely eat their neighbour's babies
so whatever they're getting outraged about, it must be something other than that.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:56,
archived)
well, they get outrged if they are the victims
that is
like the Daily Mail readers
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 11:12,
archived)
like the Daily Mail readers
Daily Mail readers hate it when their babies are eaten by chimps.
They're so uptight.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 11:20,
archived)
I was laughing until I read that link
Fucking hell. The bastard should be shot.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 9:56,
archived)
Everything is cannabis and the internet's fault.
And first person shoot-em-ups and immigrants.
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:03,
archived)
^this
*goes around to find dying people to urinate on*
this story is all so sad.
sort of good morning all
/edit: I'd say mindpiss, but that would only prove your point ;)
( ,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:05,
archived)
this story is all so sad.
sort of good morning all
/edit: I'd say mindpiss, but that would only prove your point ;)