b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » Message 9742823 (Thread)

Well see that's the idea of the compo

and you should be censoring what doesn't need to be censored therefore suggesting it does need to be censored - so painting as black cock shape on the image is not exactly censorship, you see what I'm saying right?

(

maiden is filmed before a live studio audience, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 19:21, archived)

I see a banana shape, personally.

Or maybe a plantain.

(Seance Trumpet has got no beef with a man enjoying a croissant, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 19:27, archived)

Well the compo says..

Make something look much ruder than it really is so I think I'm on the right lines, a banana wouldn't need to be censored, I think the confusion lies in starting with something that looks rude to begin with, as for painting a black cock, that's just the outline of the banana.

(barzo, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 19:31, archived)

I'd say that in deciding if something is NSFW

ask yourself not whether you can justify it technically being SFW, but whether you would like your boss to see it on your screen as they walk past. Not whether you would object to seeing it on someone elses screen as you walk past.

I once got in trouble for this image at work

media.photobucket.com/image/tramp%20passed-out%20santa%20underwear/Skrach01/MerryXmasDrunkSanta.jpg

(Seance Trumpet has got no beef with a man enjoying a croissant, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 19:33, archived)

But surely..

The whole idea of the comp is to make the mundane appear to require censorship.
The very fact that they are now censored would lead the viewer to believe there was something NSFW that is now being hidden regardless of how innocent the original image was.
Truth be told the natural reaction to this pic probably would lead to a conclusion of some cock related shenanigans so if the moderators want to make it NSFW I don't mind at all!

(barzo, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 20:02, archived)

I don't make the rules.

(Seance Trumpet has got no beef with a man enjoying a croissant, Wed 14 Oct 2009, 20:11, archived)