You're about the same age as me right?
Didn't it just drive you fucking mental the way that godawful song was everywhere in 1996? Sends shivers up my spine.

Seeing as how Oasis split up because the tragic sibling bickering reached girly slaps level, why doesn't Gallagher Sr completely kipper his brother's new band by refusing them permission to play his songs live?
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Mon 13 Aug 2012, 17:24, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

It was one of their more inoffensive efforts, what got me was the whole 'mad 4 it' personas, they were just cocks for the sake of it
Noel can't really withdraw live broadcast rights, plus their mammy would be furious
( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 13 Aug 2012, 17:31, Reply)

I have no idea about the legality of former band members doing live renditions, I always assumed the songwriter had ultimate say-so
I'm with you on their public persona - obviously - though am also grateful that it basically meant they sold fuck all in America. However I also hated every last one of their piss-poor songs with a fiery vengeance. They made Blur look competent. BLUR.
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Mon 13 Aug 2012, 17:36, Reply)

I don't mind blur, at least they developed their sound during their career, it weren't just the same song for ten years spread out over sixteen different albums

( Light In Chains maker of the ikea sofa, Mon 13 Aug 2012, 17:39, Reply)

On this point I completely agree
Didn't like their later stuff either but at least it was different. Their output whilst competing with Oasis was fucking terrible though.
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Mon 13 Aug 2012, 17:42, Reply)