b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Pure Fury » Post 2108142 | Search
This is a question Pure Fury

A friend's dad once stormed up to me and threatened to "punch your stupid face in" because I pointed a camera at him. I was 11. Have you ever done something innocent or made a harmless joke that ended in threats to your person? Tell us about it.

Thanks to Skullfunkerry for the suggestion

(, Thu 26 Sep 2013, 12:28)
Pages: Popular, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

From the FAQ:
"B3ta is all about celebrating the best stuff on the internet."

I'm struggling to find the bit that says it's dedicated to piss-taking and poor-taste humour.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 15:54, 3 replies)
I have to assume that Badger's interpreted the bit that reads: "If you can't say anything nice, then don't say anything"
as: "Why not act the cunt?"
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:11, closed)
Strictly speaking...he didn't say anything.
He just copied what all the other cunts said and put it somewhere else. Terrible bullying.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:13, closed)
"Please don't be horrible to other people just because they are new, or you didn't like their picture, or posted something that bothers you."

(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:16, closed)
*bums*
The Fail Archive celebrates the best of the worst of /qotw, and as such is wholly appropriate to b3ta.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:29, closed)
It was vaguely amusing at the time
Constantly ploughing the same furrow every week is just fucking tiresome
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:50, closed)
Pathetic!
He's reposted my Hotmail story on no less than 437 occasions.

But that 'Queen of the Harpies' nonsense always makes me giggle.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:56, closed)
Eh, it's hardly the worst thing to happen on /qotw.
Probably not even in anyone's top 10.
(, Wed 2 Oct 2013, 11:15, closed)

"Please don't post on here just because you are a creepy and arse-clenchingly tedious, self-aggrandising knobcheese who preys on vulnerable and let's face it plug-ugly smackheads, and I didn't like your picture of that scoper up a tree in a Yoda mask, and posted some things that bored me to the brink of suicide."
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:58, closed)
I should probably do something respectable instead.
Like shove toys up vulnerable women with drug habits to feed.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 18:27, closed)
Or post something vaguely original once in a while

(, Wed 2 Oct 2013, 15:52, closed)
Careful now

(, Wed 2 Oct 2013, 18:07, closed)
That would still be true if it were perpetually 2003.
Unfortunately, the internet has moved on and there are myriad other sites that do what b3ta wants to do, better than it ever could.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:22, closed)
I take the point that the FAQ hasn't been significantly updated for yonks;
nevertheless, the claim that the site is dedicated to something is quite strong; I can't see how AB derives the claim. For that reason, I'm tempted not to accept it.

EDIT: By which I mean, if the site is dedicated to poor-taste and pisstake, those posts that aren't in poor taste or taking the piss have presumably missed the point of the site, and the poster has made a mistake. But I don't think that that's plausible. Therefore, modus tollens, that's not the thing to which the site is dedicated.

/arguingoversemantics blog
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:31, closed)
'B3ta will eat your soul and destroy your will to live.'
Or so it says when searching for the site on google. Looks like it's true in your case.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:03, closed)
The soul eating I'm not quite sure about, but the last bit is bang on.

(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:13, closed)
Because pisstaking and poor taste humour is the best stuff on the internet.
therefore,Caecilius est in tablinum scribit, you are a nullo.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 16:52, closed)
Hold on.
Isn't a "nullo" a person that has their genitals removed? Are you suggesting that Enzyme's got no sack?
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:06, closed)
I am saying,
therefore, Enzymio something something nul scrotum severus and I feel frightfully clever about it.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:12, closed)
But wait, no hang on, IF he's a nullo and I'm thoroughly convinced by your argument that he is
then how does he go about all this incestual sister sexing that he's on record as saying is perfectly OK?
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:15, closed)
Because for him all 'fannius interactum' is purely academic
and therefore, 'incesto cum soror flangiatorum' is 'acceptabilis'.
(, Tue 1 Oct 2013, 17:24, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Popular, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1