b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10792276 (Thread)

# To be honest if that's not safe for work with a big censor bar across the middle
then Wobbly Bloke's girls taking off bikini GIFs down below are also not safe for work, especially given that they have no censor bars. Frankly so are any pictures of scantily clad women.

Of course, if the censor bar wasn't there when he first posted this my point is moot and it would, indeed, be NSFW.
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:12, archived)
# oh he's still posting that shit? lol
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:21, archived)
# Yes
Also, to clarify my position, I also think that the whole of B3ta is NSFW and any boss would be justified in being quite upset that you were on it during worktime - which many of us obviously are. But if we focus on things that "could look like porn from a distance" then girls taking their bikini tops off probably passes as that at least as much as the Queen with her knockers out.
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:47, archived)
# ^ & eye of the beholder, mayhaps
atomic's wakeboarding cock boys were left well alone?
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:03, archived)
# haha
yes, much of b3ta is nsfw. i think the common view is probably that if it's a cartoon it's not porn, although i don't believe anyone who runs b3ta can have failed to see a distressing amount of cartoon porn online

definitely eye of the beholder, really. i take the view that tits and cocks are porn, and i've had this picture called both nsfw and totally sfw: www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/43351/1174580664.jpg

in hindsight, probably nsfw
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:30, archived)
# the general rule is if it looks like real human nudity or sex then it should be linked/thumbnailed
so people who want to look can and those who don't, don't have to.
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:31, archived)
# YOU DONT BLONG HERE
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 11:40, archived)
# The censor bar wasn't there when I posted my response, hence the vitriol.
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:32, archived)
# In which case my point was moot and I retract my statement
As you were

:)


Edit: just saw the mod edit, somehow I missed it at first.
(, Wed 20 Jun 2012, 10:45, archived)