Not our rights.But it's going to cause a few problems for the agencies who own all those pictures of Templeton Peck.
(
0% Interest Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More,
Fri 24 Oct 2003, 15:13,
archived)
I expectit will be classed as art or a parody or something.
(
bovine I'm so old, even my old is old,
Fri 24 Oct 2003, 15:15,
archived)
I thinkcopyright can subsist in both the original image and a "complation" of that image. So they would have to get permission from both the original photograher and the Tattyslopper.*
* this could, in fact, be wrong
(* this could, in fact, be wrong
splorp ®,
Fri 24 Oct 2003, 15:20,
archived)