no apology needed
I didn't have to step into this thread, and probably shouldn't have. I wasn't looking for a debate, only to offer a view that differed from others. Que cera cera. =)
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:07,
archived)
Which is why we're
still contributing to this thread. Go ahead and step in and FFS don't apologise for it - doesn't our society (i.e. western culture) pride itself on freedom of speech?
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:10,
archived)
Hell yeah.
And we'll invade anyone who disagrees. So long as they're sitting on some nice big oil wells.
</troll>
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:14,
archived)
</troll>
If I were President
I'd invade the country with the most kittens.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:18,
archived)
They've already
colonised us culturally, financially and politically. There's no need.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:21,
archived)
hehehehe
freedom of speech is sketchy too... look at what happened to Howard Stern.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:14,
archived)
That isn't a freedom of speech case
as you don't have a "right" to broadcast a show on a national network.
Though I don't agree with his sacking, it has nothing to do with the government.
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:17,
archived)
Though I don't agree with his sacking, it has nothing to do with the government.
There again
just an example... a broad example, but an example nonetheless. =)
( ,
Tue 2 Mar 2004, 9:19,
archived)