Parallel universe, they say?
From the Meanwhile, in a parallel universe... challenge. See all 465 entries (closed)
( , Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:27, archived)
So this is how you get to that strange and relatively unknown place that the parallel universe is.
/shameless repost
/shameless repost
From the Meanwhile, in a parallel universe... challenge. See all 465 entries (closed)
( , Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:27, archived)
no
believe it or not, there is a stargate clique at my school.
they're a jolly bunch, but they need tans
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:32,
archived)
they're a jolly bunch, but they need tans
i thought the film was ok
i thought the series was repetitive
like most other sci fi series
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:32,
archived)
like most other sci fi series
I did like *ONE* episode that I saw.
The one where there was a groundhog day style time loop.
ST:TNG always got so effing poncy whenever they did a time loop story. (And they were forbidden in Lexx, though the series was set in a time-looping universe)
edit:
/i'll get me pyjamas.
g'night all :)
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:34,
archived)
ST:TNG always got so effing poncy whenever they did a time loop story. (And they were forbidden in Lexx, though the series was set in a time-looping universe)
edit:
/i'll get me pyjamas.
g'night all :)
I wouldn´t be surprised
as I am the only person who likes Highlander :^P
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:53,
archived)
That ramp always make me think
they must have been planning to send Evel Knevel through at some point.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:32,
archived)
I am slightly perturbed by the fact
that the bloke doing the goatse-action is apparently married
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:41,
archived)
i just noticed that, as well.
didn't feel like i could be arsed into pointing it out at the moment
i wonder how the missus feels about it
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:43,
archived)
i wonder how the missus feels about it
**WARNING**
Very not safe for work, but this guy is allegedly him: www.bmezine.com/news/people/A20210/plp56/
Remember, NOT AT ALL SAFE FOR WORK.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:47,
archived)
Remember, NOT AT ALL SAFE FOR WORK.
yikes!
I like the fact that they pixelate out his tackle ... 'cos that would be disturbing
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:51,
archived)
I honestly have never seen tubgirl
can it be as bad as my worst imaginings?
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:53,
archived)
Nah, not at all.
But then again I'm immune to virtually anything the internet has to throw me.
I've watched autopsies so little phases me.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:54,
archived)
I've watched autopsies so little phases me.
ok then
*googles for tubgirl*
*vomits*
*scratches out eyes*
yeah, bring it on
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:58,
archived)
*vomits*
*scratches out eyes*
yeah, bring it on
don't let curiosity get to you
DO NOT see tubgirl. it's an image that nothing but death can erase from your mind.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:58,
archived)
To give you an idea of how the tubgirl is evil
I must have 30 or more Goatse-based shops, but didn´t have the guts to make a single tubgirl-based one.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 3:01,
archived)
Seen that.
It´s not him. The true Goatse man is much skinner than him. Also, notice that he does not wear a wedding ring, and says he is single.
It´s disturbing that there are more than one around, though.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:52,
archived)
It´s disturbing that there are more than one around, though.
uggghhhhh
i can't believe i actually read that entire article
/sits on ice
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:57,
archived)
/sits on ice
ASSHOLE!
(No Pun) That link inserts a trojan!
thank God for Norton
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 2:58,
archived)
thank God for Norton
WOT
what's it called, i wanna make sure ad-aware picks it up
/edit: stop scaring me
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 3:01,
archived)
/edit: stop scaring me
Dunno
Not going back to find out.
(Consider XoftSpy, it picks up a lot of shit that ad-aware misses, but ad-aware=good)
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 3:08,
archived)
(Consider XoftSpy, it picks up a lot of shit that ad-aware misses, but ad-aware=good)
Hmmm...
Thanks, I'll check that out. XoftSpy was highly recommended by computer "authority" here.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 3:24,
archived)
Xoftspy is crap
Another reason is for the huge # of False positives it has. I gave up using the program because Ad-Aware and Spybot S&D have since become significantly better.
It targets spywareblaster registry entries and has yet to remove them, and there is no way to contact them about it.
It labels QTTask (that's QuickTime Task [the little Q icon in system tray]) as an adware agent of a different company (Labelled Claria I think, I can't remember). Any fumbduck company that would do that has to be either stealing someone else's definitions or has no knowledge of computers at all.
Use with caution, and fgs don't spend money on it.
( ,
Sat 11 Sep 2004, 17:32,
archived)
It targets spywareblaster registry entries and has yet to remove them, and there is no way to contact them about it.
It labels QTTask (that's QuickTime Task [the little Q icon in system tray]) as an adware agent of a different company (Labelled Claria I think, I can't remember). Any fumbduck company that would do that has to be either stealing someone else's definitions or has no knowledge of computers at all.
Use with caution, and fgs don't spend money on it.