If b3ta were like digg.com


From the Imaginary Applications for Web 2.0 challenge. See all 87 entries (closed)

( drunkenoaf, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:33, archived)

Haha
Clickwooyayetc
(Scouse Bastard used to be indecisive, but now he's not so sure, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:34, archived)

Hahaha
Yay for premise-spoiling summaries! :)
(Psychosomatic Tumor Laugh your life cause there ain't much to cry for, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:34, archived)

it really alters the humus of the pics
For example, the descriptions sound rather lame, but the pics are funny, of course.
( drunkenoaf, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:35, archived)

Arf!

( KernKraft Gosh, there isn't much noise outside today, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:35, archived)

Heh.. Excellent!
I have a hilarious bookmarked page from Digg for the stuff they said when my star wars 168k found its way on there - "Wow that was bad. Not only did they skip many scenes, the pixel art was bad. It was like a 12 year old made a Star Wars cartoon. No digg."
( FoldsFive .blogspot.com, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:37, archived)

oh, it's full of wankers now
half the comments are from people with no social skills (e.g. Oh, an apple story. LAME!!10101001). On the other hand, the articles are often great.
( drunkenoaf, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:41, archived)

digg has all the Web2.0 social-ness going for it...
but Slashdot is a much better place for real arcticles. And um, intellectual discussion. Yes.
( Blork krolB, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:49, archived)

I have both on RSS feeds.
Meh. I'm trying my best for this compo. Not much hummus in there to find, is there?
( drunkenoaf, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 20:57, archived)

I don't see why they can't just get along

( abandonnship BEEEEEEES, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:02, archived)

slashdot is uglier
and gets the stories later.
( drunkenoaf, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:11, archived)

Haha

( Naive Amoeba Hardly ever goes on this site anymore., Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:00, archived)

unrinating
*arf*
(Soupy Twist BEST BEFORE:, Tue 18 Apr 2006, 21:17, archived)