Sometimes it's necessary to include the film title to avoid a long line of ris
so using the poster or parts of it makes most sense
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:28,
archived)
it could be put...
...in the subject heading. or even just as a title to the picture. if it's done properly it should be pretty obvious to most.
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:29,
archived)
not if you pick an obscure film
When the title is part of the pun you want to keep the two together too (labelling your own picture sort of thing)
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:31,
archived)
so in those cases
make it the poster. i'd just like more variety, really. this endless stream of film posters is doing my nut in cos like it was said it's the easiest option that people are taking.
edit: you didn't say it was the easiest option that people were taking
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:34,
archived)
edit: you didn't say it was the easiest option that people were taking
may i throw in a test case?
this:
versus this:
www.b3ta.com/board/7001797
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:37,
archived)
versus this:
www.b3ta.com/board/7001797
a proper test case
would include the title in the subject line or post but not the picture.
it's not that hard a concept to be able to say what your film title in the thread without doing a film poster.
( ,
Thu 22 Mar 2007, 15:39,
archived)
it's not that hard a concept to be able to say what your film title in the thread without doing a film poster.