Have some crap satire.


From the Computer Errors challenge. See all 409 entries (closed)

(Cuthbert Annihilator http://www.gamesbooksfilms.com/, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:52, archived)

what?

( Afinkawan, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:53, archived)

( prodigy69 Errapolis, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:54, archived)

Are you saying
He could click the X in the corner and it would cirumvent the abort sequence?
(Cuthbert Annihilator http://www.gamesbooksfilms.com/, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:55, archived)

hmm
It would seem so.

Is there a compo entry he actually likes? Obviously none are up to his standards.
( Blazemore Last seen on, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:56, archived)

i feel it is more the compo than the entries
he's against
( naD, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:57, archived)

well
It is a good idea for a compo, for example the Fatal Error one. People don't read the compo title properly. It's not about making up crappy fake error messages, it's about IF EXISTING errors told the truth.
( Blazemore Last seen on, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:59, archived)

Yeah, I didn't actually read the compo, just its title.
In any case, apart from a few maybe, how much scope is there is they "told the truth", whilst being funny (or at least attempting to)?
(Cuthbert Annihilator http://www.gamesbooksfilms.com/, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 22:00, archived)

The actual compo text is only ever a starting point
but people should at least stick to funny stuff.
( Afinkawan, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 22:00, archived)

yes, you would be right.

( prodigy69 Errapolis, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:59, archived)

and what would 'my standards' be then fucknut?

( prodigy69 Errapolis, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:58, archived)

They're pretty high
;)
( The Coast Of Yemen, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 21:59, archived)

they where fucking amateurs

( prodigy69 Errapolis, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 22:03, archived)

socks :)
we all love your socks
( mutster101 is not the new Doctor Who, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 22:00, archived)