that is a tad small
let alone the NSFW-ness
( head-doctor internet, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:52, archived)

Didn't mean it to be this small. My bad.

( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:55, archived)

Yes.
You're bad.
:D
( head-doctor internet, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:56, archived)

I'm Bad!
( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:57, archived)

he did write "Click for bigger (82KB)" as is the custom
but i'll grant you the nsfw
( cumquat may lemon lime and bitter disappointment, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:56, archived)

I put NSFW in the title now.

( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:56, archived)

i think the idea is to link it if it's nsfw. if you think about it for a minute you'll see why

( cumquat may lemon lime and bitter disappointment, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 22:00, archived)

I suppose.
Never done it that way before.
( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 22:00, archived)

Is that better?

( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 22:03, archived)

if you click it, it's still tiny

( head-doctor internet, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:59, archived)

hang on, you're not just talking about his cock, are you?

( cumquat may lemon lime and bitter disappointment, Wed 19 Dec 2007, 22:01, archived)

You can't really see anything.
I picked that pic for that reason.
( Maffers Stupidity has its charms. Ignorance does not., Wed 19 Dec 2007, 21:59, archived)