Two in one. If you get what I mean.
OKAY OKAY OKAY I FIXED IT. Now just under the 30kb happy limit.
I like the one on the left better.
Once again, Ben is far funnier than me.
From the Ronseal Plots challenge. See all 737 entries (closed)
( , Wed 28 May 2008, 22:31, archived)
OKAY OKAY OKAY I FIXED IT. Now just under the 30kb happy limit.
I like the one on the left better.
Once again, Ben is far funnier than me.
From the Ronseal Plots challenge. See all 737 entries (closed)
( , Wed 28 May 2008, 22:31, archived)
You better be kidding.
That's going to get you very much raped.
( ,
Wed 28 May 2008, 22:31,
archived)
oh yeah!
this is gonna be better than that time all the pigs got rounded up in the barn and we burned them then ate them!
( ,
Wed 28 May 2008, 22:32,
archived)
I made the internet cry. =(
What did I do wrong? Two images in one?
This is pretty much optimised to the point where any lower and the font has artefacts all over it. And not the Indiana Jones style artefacts.
I'm sorry if I made you cry, b3ta. C'mon. Gis' a hug. There, there. It's okay.
( ,
Wed 28 May 2008, 22:39,
archived)
This is pretty much optimised to the point where any lower and the font has artefacts all over it. And not the Indiana Jones style artefacts.
I'm sorry if I made you cry, b3ta. C'mon. Gis' a hug. There, there. It's okay.
oh shut up, you optimised fuck all
you could easily get these down to 35kb each without them losing anything
( ,
Wed 28 May 2008, 22:47,
archived)
then you make the image smaller.
b3ta faq says please limit to 50kb. Not please make it whatever the size you fucking want because you can't work your software but if you say you tried and can't do it all will be ok.
if you can't do it properly then don't do it. would be a suggestion I might make.
( ,
Wed 28 May 2008, 22:51,
archived)
if you can't do it properly then don't do it. would be a suggestion I might make.