![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Literal Road Signs"){kind=small}
kind of on task...
From the Literal Road Signs challenge. See all 678 entries (closed)
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 10:57, archived)
Ah the increasing cost of petrol.Ho hum, I prefer walking anyway :)
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Ph.D., Sun 29 Jun 2008, 10:58,
archived)
we would have a riot about the rising cost of fuelbut a molotov cocktail now costs the same as a shoulder mounted rocket launcher so we can't
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:15, archived)
:)it's not a peasant revolt unless there's the use of rotting vegtables as projectiles..
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:17, archived)
youfucking hippy
(
the RAND corporation - thats Hitlertainment..., Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:23,
archived)
have a comic about food shortages to go with your petrol crisis
GO TEAM CLICK!
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:02, archived)
We're not running out of food though.We're just throwing away too much and if GM turns out to be as desasterous as it could potentially be then ther would be no going back.
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:14,
archived)
people are too fatamerica now consumes upto 13% more food then a decade or 2 ago because they're all fatty lard-arses!
i say, if you weigh over 20 stone, you should be fined, taxed and tazer'd till you loose some weight
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:17,
archived)
i love the idea of tazering fat peopleit'd just be funny
//zap//
//wobble wobble//
//zap//
//wobble//
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:19, archived)
the japanese government agrees with youwww.cnn.com/video/#/video/health/2008/06/23/kyung.fat.busters.cnn
american news website unfortunately but theres avideo of peoplebeing messured and everything
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:21, archived)
ive always said thosebastards have sense!
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:25,
archived)
I do not understand wy one would tax fat people more?They spend more and are good for the economy and, just like everyone else, around 85% of their NHS costs happen in the last 8 days of their lives.
Everyone becomes terminal - as long as they get to retirement age first then what's the problem?
Indeed, it is healthy people who live beyond retirement who constitute the greatest drain on the economy.
(
Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:27,
archived)
becausethere's a lot of buzz around them currently so it's deemed a sensibkle way for the government to seem to be doing good *healthier peoples* while making money.
it's like boris banning drinkingon public transport... binge drinking is a big thing so i's seen to be tackling the £drinking culture" but he isn't he's just prohibiting it and prohibition generally breeds contempt. and this goes to enforce the culture rather than stem it. *in my opinion.. but my opinion is generally hellishly liberal*
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:31, archived)
With the drinking thing,The loud shouty pissed wanker was not stopped before and will not be now. All that the bill will do is let the police arrest teenagers.
They have banned drinking on the grass outside my workplace and the filth have taken bottles of cider from tramps and poured it out - but there was a champagne lunch their on Friday for one of the local legal partnerships.
hmm!
(
Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:34,
archived)
aaaahgood old fashioned irony.
proibition doesn't work, has never worked, will never work.
the banning of alcohol in america.. all that produced was Al Capone. although i'd giggle if some how 1920's gangsters helps smuggle alcohol for a fee on to a train.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:40, archived)
HeheheImagine if you really were big bomed:P
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:22,
archived)
big bomed?like a fat terrorist?
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:24,
archived)
It's got to be a calculated risk.people are just all to keen to fear the worse whenever there is a good idea...
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:18, archived)
^ thisgenetics will form the basis of the third industrial revolution
thats my thoughts
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:21, archived)
Because it's ireiversable and the risks havea been calculatedwhich makes going it the way it's being done even more stupid!
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:22,
archived)
what is it exactly that you think genetic engineering will do?what are you so afraid of that your willing to hold back human knowledge and advancement?
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:25, archived)
the coderandomly vanished... it does that to me on occassion. not quite sure how i manage it
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:33, archived)
The code only vanishes if you press post when the code is incorrect.(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:35,
archived)
aaaahpme and my cack handed attempt to type it out. funny to think i got a 2.1 for multimedia :D
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:44, archived)
We have been doing it for thousands of years.Throwing away the bad plants etc.
Tomatoes didn't just appear as they are, gardeners deliberately cross-pollinated them.
See also livestock.
(
Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:29,
archived)
truethe average sheep is now over twice the size it was 250 years ago.
and cows have had all the intelligence bred out of them.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:31, archived)
That's more un-natural selectionI'm talking fish DNA in grain etc.
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:36,
archived)
And the difference is . . . ?(
Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:39,
archived)
grow your own kedgereewhat a splendid idea
(
god save the queen hardly ever original, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 12:01,
archived)
actually all DNAis more or less the same
so the fish DNA in plants is the same as cross-breading plants with other plants.
irrationality is the enemy of progress.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:50, archived)
it's what i've been saying all along(
god save the queen hardly ever original, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:50,
archived)
I guess the world might be overrunwith a really fast-growing, edible plant.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:31, archived)
gm food=$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$and nothing else
(
Discomeats RUSK! FOR VICTORY!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 12:41,
archived)
Maximum credible (proppelled by the media) and most likely are two different thingsIf GM is done wisely, it could be controlled. Although with any luck we can get around ever needing it.
btw: my "funny if it wasnt true" remark was in general rather than specific to GM crops.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:28, archived)
you should be ashamed of your selfhelping spring someform of intelligent debate on b3ta.
tsk!
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:46, archived)
You started the thread!but yes, I shouldn't do that...I've bailed out of the specific GM argument because it's outside my field....boom boom
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:53, archived)
oh deari think you've gone to seed.
not to worry if anyone picks on you we'll launch a spud missile.
i am ashamed by these puns they make me furrow my brow.
/gets-coat
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 12:00, archived)
it's generally downto media induced hysteria. distortion and such.
a recent study into video violence showed that there is no causal link that watch violence makes you wanna commit violence but it's just violent people have more of an affinity to watch violent things. no real news coverage coz it goes against the national hegemony. damn you hegemony!!
Edit: my generally might not be all that general.. but more often that not in my opinion
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:24, archived)
who said we had real news coverage in this country?mind you its better than the fox network.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:27, archived)
I can't take any of it seriously any moreit seems to of out brass eyed brass eye.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:35, archived)
I spent long enough studying applied plant bio at uni to have a good enough clue that it is bad new.(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:38,
archived)
this is quite true!have 3 woo's
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:05,
archived)
holy shitting nora!where did you take that photo?
thats cheap!
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:05,
archived)
Hahaha fuck you all!I use public transport:P
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:11,
archived)
fuck the freak circusjust hop onto the nearest bus or train!
(
Sir T. Skellington LIMES ARE FOR CUNTS!, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:12,
archived)
Yeah!Beat up an old codger today for one!
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:15,
archived)
so that'swhere my dad's vanished to.
the house is mine!
go team inheritence!
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:16, archived)
Sorry he had the deeds on him.But ,don't worry, I'll give you 24 hours to move out.
(
riverghost B3ta: lacking Captain Wow since, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:20,
archived)
damn and blast!well i'm going to piss all over it in those 24hrs. enjoy your ammonia rich household.
(, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:25, archived)
HahahaYeah we're all pwned now, because public transport uses no energy of any kind, therefore rising energy costs will not affect ticket prices!
You definitely win ghostie :)
(
the holly and the ivv, Sun 29 Jun 2008, 11:16,
archived)
