
WiL would like to apologise unreservedly to whomever's lovely holiday
picture he has just defiled. But it is pretty funny...
*edit* Honestly never occurred to me anyone would SERIOUSLY see a little girl feeding ducks in just her T-shirt as sexual, but fair enough, now with added skirt!
From the Abusive ducks challenge. See all 473 entries (closed)
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:55, archived)
and he thinks that picture is absolutely disgusting!
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:57, archived)
I don't give a flying fuck about content because I'm at home but bosses and prime ministers probably see things differently.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 12:59, archived)
you walk close to the line sometimes and I didn't mean to seriously offend, but I honestly never saw the original pic as anything more than totally innocent, but I guess in retrospect it might have been too close for comfort for some in the context of this joke, eh?
*edit* Sparked quite an interesting board discussion tho!
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:27, archived)
Why the hostility? It (was) a pic of a toddler with a naked bum plus an animated nonce joke. Since when has b3ta ever shied away from taboo humour?
It wasn't like he posted something actually nasty.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:15, archived)
at a glance: kids arse and that approximates porn. Far less has been mod edit previously.
other than that the image is kinda funny.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:20, archived)
yes I know that there are slightly more risque pics on here. It's something that I could do without seeing whilst at work in a school!
And yes I know what b3ta is about and perhaps I should look at it at home not work, but I like b3ta and the people on it.
Sorry if this is a bit rantish.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:20, archived)
in a normal holiday-snap context, of which EVERY mother in the western world has at least 20 of each of her brood... would cause consternation. I mean, mothers drag those things out whenever relos come around, even your small-mouthed, small-brained arch-catholic great-aunt! And the old dear just looks at them and smiles and says "They're so lovely when they're young!" (forgetting about the tantrums and the pooey nappies etc etc)
But yeah, as much as we try to keep things generally SFW, b3ta is really something that should not be viewed in such sensitive environments :-)
But I still don't see anything wrong with such a pic in that context :)
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:33, archived)
They're not generally known for being a real threat in this situation, which is what *I* thought was funny.
But as I say, I bow to board opinion on this one, as I am aware I was being close to the knuckle and not being a parent or an office worker I may not be the one to judge on such matters...
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:45, archived)
but I guess somethings gone on that means folks can only see pron in child nudity these days.
Personally I find it way more offensive when folks use real nonces, or indeed guys who have been acquitted of their accusations, but I'll bow to board opinion as it means nothing to the joke that she had a bare bum.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:22, archived)
but some managers are wankers and want excuses to sack people.
I don't think it's quite right to be impolite about the whole matter though.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:28, archived)
not being in an office environment, I guess I'm not in tune with that.
(, Thu 24 Jul 2008, 13:30, archived)