b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The iPad » Message 9890798

[challenge entry] well, it's bigger and heavier than the ipone

From the The iPad challenge. See all 368 entries (closed)

(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:48, archived)
# Sod Saber Book
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
# Vast Jack
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
# minor threadjack
this was keeping me awake last night.
Are there any electronics boffins here who can tell me what this would do?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:50, archived)
# FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DO NOT SWITCH THIS ON
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# yeah but what would it do?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
# Almost nothing
is my opinion. But I am sure somebody else will be able to improve on that
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:58, archived)
# well sometimes you'd be surprised what stuff does.
I made a physical analogue of this ages ago when I was trying to invent a constant engagement continuously variable transmission. Which is supposed to be impossible, but I'm telling you it's not.

(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:16, archived)
# Instant singularity
Which would end badly for us fleshy types.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:58, archived)
# are those supposed to be coils?
because I don't know either way.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
# It would
disguise itself as a robot.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:54, archived)
# It creates a shortcut through a particularly thick hedge
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
# Can I have biscuits?
Sorry, actually meant to write Can I haz bizkitz plz? but then I remembered where I was posting.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# not a lot
err, looks like a complicated way of doing a 1:1 transformer, But need to know the turns ratios the be precise.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# assume # of turns is proportional to # of squiggles.
my thinking is that, through one circuit, it's step down, but through the other, it's step up, so it could be 1:1. Or it might not be. Depending on which way the current wants to go.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:00, archived)
# Putting AC thru it would be odd.
Phase would change on output.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:03, archived)
# it would have to be AC, or it wouldn't do very much at all.
you could also introduce LC filters in the middle, for lols, to get a transformer whose ratio depends on the frequency.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:05, archived)
# non issue
it's balanced just switch over the connections
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# yep
on the LHS the upper half of the centre section looks like a 3:1 step down, in phase with the lower half which looks like a 3:2 step down. And on the RHS vice versa, overall giving you in=out
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:04, archived)
# but that's assuming equal current distribution between the two paths,
which isn't necessarily the case for all types of output load. I've a feeling the overall ratio could be quite unpredictable.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# possibly but not necessarily.
If we're getting into that level of detail we need detailed specs of the two transformers.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:10, archived)
# I'm going to have to make one, I think.
It's not going to blow my house up, despite the concern expressed above. At least, not if I only use low voltage.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:13, archived)
# I'm intrigued now
What do you expect?

it's going to give you in=out unless you go to too high or too low freqs or too high or too low power loads, and then, unless there's some odd unbalance in the transformers or wiring it'll be nothing unusual
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:22, archived)
# Would it have some capacitance?
(Reading between the lines {;-) )
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# everything has some capacitance.
which raises an interesting point about the gate charge of MOSFETs in switching power supplies.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:08, archived)
# and PAL and NTSC
NTSC (Never The Same Color) bolloxed the colour on US TVs due the base emittter capacitance variation of transistors changing with DC offset, PAL (Pricey And Late) overcame this with an expensive modification
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:16, archived)
# ?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:02, archived)
# I actually tried to work that out before I went onto the next panel
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:03, archived)
# I know nothing about electronics.
I don't even know about stuff like the differences between voltage and current.

Now, if you were to express a circuit as a weighted graph, on the other hand....

(actually come to think of it, I only really know about unweighted graphs, so never mind)
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# that's an interesting question
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:25, archived)
# Wait what?
Don't make her forget her lust for women, silly man!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
# iWas wondering about that myself
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)
# heheh
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)