James Cameron: 3D conversion best for classic films
Fuck off Cameron. Really, fuck off.
(, Wed 3 Nov 2010, 23:37, Share, Reply)
I concur.
With you coliander.
(
Herb Alpert's Taxi Driver I have very beautiful lips, Wed 3 Nov 2010, 23:44,
Share,
Reply)
I guess it depends on how you read that statement.
I don't think he's saying that 3D conversion should be used on classic films, but that the only valid excuse to use it at all is on an older films that weren't shot in 3D to begin with. It generally looks awful and so if you intend to release a film in 3D, then shoot it in 3D in the first place (which can look very good if done well - Avatar or Coraline, for example).
(
benryves Now I'm radioactive! That can't be good!, Wed 3 Nov 2010, 23:54,
Share,
Reply)
Avatar's 3d looked really tacky in my opinion.
The effects look a lot better in 2d
(
Damien's Hearse, Thu 4 Nov 2010, 0:29,
Share,
Reply)
Despite the fact
he very publically slagged off Clash of the Titans for retro-fitting in 3D.
The guy has turned into an almighty wanker since he stopped making decent films
(
Joe Scaramanga with a G-double-O-D vibration, Thu 4 Nov 2010, 10:08,
Share,
Reply)
Publicly slagging off Clash of the Titans
is surely in tune with his statement; i.e. if you're making a film and release it in 3D film it in 3D in the first place, don't add the effect post-production.
(
benryves Now I'm radioactive! That can't be good!, Thu 4 Nov 2010, 11:03,
Share,
Reply)