Yes - you're confusing religion and theism.
I don't condone wife-beating, child abuse etc at all, religion or no.

While I accept the rather incendiary rhetoric, that does seem a little disingenuous - along the lines of "When did you stop beating your wife?".

My live and let live position is laudable. Everyone should think like me. Of course, no one else is actually perfect.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 31 Aug 2010, 16:29, 1 reply)

Meh, I see what you're saying....
That the intellectual position of theism is seperate from the actual practices of existing religions, and that as you can't disprove the existence of higher beings then people should be free to worship (in the abstract sense, rather than the evils of what really happens).

However, and I'm struggling to find the words for this, it does seem like a fairly niggardly position you're taking. OK, one could argue that the right to believe whatever you like is important, but for the most part, religion and theism are very tightly bound concepts.

Hmmmm, reading that through I'm not sure I've made my point well enough. Hey ho.
( kappynitty doubled your entendre on, Tue 31 Aug 2010, 17:12, closed)

I disagree that religion and theism are tightly bound concepts, and that the position I'm taking is niggardly.
I think that it's entirely down to the brain user.

I will accept that many are unwilling to differentiate between them, however.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 31 Aug 2010, 17:17, closed)