Errr...
if someone is physically and emotionally mature enough to be out actively looking for sex, and if all parties concerned are consenting and willing, then morally speaking I don't see where the problem is. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
(having said that, twenty-eight and fourteen or so is pushing it rather)
(idle insomniac enjoys listening to Sigur Rós at stupid hours, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 3:59, 3 replies)

hang on,
I've just read thecurriedavenger's reply again, and having put myself in creatrix's position in the story, I now feel distinctly uncomfortable. :( Yeah, I can see the point. *shudder*
(idle insomniac enjoys listening to Sigur Rós at stupid hours, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 4:02, closed)

well
because she was "underdeveloped" - obviously she wasn't physically mature enough.
(Holy Gabrielle is Holy, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 4:58, closed)

idle insomniac...
..."if all parties concerned are consenting and willing" is pretty much the same as the argument put forward by paedophiles everywhere.
However, if under age she cannot legally give consent and clearly she was "under-developed" - something that creatrix and others of his ilk find attractive.

Good to see you reconsidered the issue and recognised the 'shudder-factor' though - not so for creatrix, who seemed to think the fact that it happened over 20 years ago made some kind of difference.
(emadex thinks the world will end on, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 7:15, closed)

hold on
you can't just tar people as paedophiles...

Do you people all work for the Daily Mail?
( GrandmaOfShoes, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 11:35, closed)