I don't think anyone is denying that
the denial comes from the idea that those women are the ones making porn. It might be nicer and simpler to say 'of course they enjoy it, and are doing it in a sexually liberated fashion, being paid a decent wage, treated like human beings, and are DEFINITELY not trafficked into it or abused or raped at any stage' because it prevents any need to think about it or question it. Some of them are obviously. A lot of them aren't. I don't think you can very easily tell the difference.

Bugger. Way too serious for the internet
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Fri 12 Aug 2011, 15:47, 2 replies)

Yes - I've already personally apologised to chickenlady for being a humourless twat about it all.
Have a good Friday - I'm off to try and get my Mrs drunk.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 12 Aug 2011, 16:00, closed)

Some of the most horrifying porn I've ever seen
has been some stuff where the women's expressions are empty. Where their mouths are smiling but their eyes are vacant. Or where their mouths are smiling, but their eyes have that glint of horror, as if one last vestige of the soul is crying out for rescue.

I've seen some pretty eye-watering stuff, a lot of which didn't turn me on, but the stuff which has actually made me question the legitimacy of the porn business is the stuff where the women honestly look like they're hating everything they're doing.

Nothing wrong with filming people fucking, but for God's sake leave it to those who genuinely enjoy it.
( flake has nothing against your right leg, Fri 12 Aug 2011, 16:49, closed)

Well said!

( Tourette's ( . )( . ) has a monkey hair in her fried egg, Tue 16 Aug 2011, 2:06, closed)