b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Tales of the Unexplained » Post 194447 | Search
This is a question Tales of the Unexplained

Flying saucers. Big Cats. Men in Black. Satan walking the Earth. Derek Acorah, also walking the Earth...

Tell us your stories of the supernatural. WoooOOOooOO!

suggestion by Kaol

(, Thu 3 Jul 2008, 10:03)
Pages: Latest, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

go and read the evidence, watch the collpase at the link in my post then read below
As your own eyes witness — WTC Building #7 (a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse
3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
4.“Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Tons of molten metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor).
7.Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8.FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9.Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10.Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

This is not a 'collapse', it is an explosion!

As seen in this revealing photo the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosions: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1.Extremely rapid onset of “collapse”
2.Sounds of explosions and flashes of light witnessed near the beginning of the "collapse" by over 100 first responders
3."Squibs", or focused explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos
4.Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust
5.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6.Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves
7.Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at nearly free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance
8.1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint
9.Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away
10.Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 4 - 20 ton steel beams up to 500 feet
11.Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure
12.Tons of molten metal found by FDNY and numerous other experts under all 3 high-rises
13.Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
14.FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
15.more than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3.Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

BECAUSE IT SEEMS DIFFICULT, OUTRAGEOUS OR JUST PLAIN MAD DOESN'T MEAN IT DIDN'T HAPPEN

Physicists find it practically impossible to explain how this could happen as reported - however and large and growing body of Engineers, Scientists, Architects etc can find no plausible explanation OTHER than a controlled demolotion


wake up america
(, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 14:18, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, ... 1