It's a .jpg too
Filesizewise it is MASSIVE, yeah. You should've seen what it was like when it was all on one file >_<
Unless you like downloading 1.7 MB files you would NOT want the original.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:32,
archived)
Unless you like downloading 1.7 MB files you would NOT want the original.
Yeah :/
I know. Big file. Hit self on head to ease pain. Demand comments on picture instead of file size.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:35,
archived)
hmmm... nice pic and all that
but there is no need for a static image to be over 50k
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:36,
archived)
Thank you
But I have tried getting it smaller, this is acutally way lower than it started off at, I physically can't trim it any smaller, and quality wise I can't either >_< too late now, two or three pics above me, so it won't get any exposure either way.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:39,
archived)
course it
will!
what about making the background a bit more plain, a quick resize, and try to optimise it after that?
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:40,
archived)
what about making the background a bit more plain, a quick resize, and try to optimise it after that?
>_< Unfortunently
I originally did this as an .html file and took a screenshot, I no longer have the file to alter :(
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:44,
archived)
you can demand nothing!
monkeyboy!
but the pic is cool, needs to be smaller.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:38,
archived)
but the pic is cool, needs to be smaller.
I DEMAND ALL!
Thank you, yeah, it does need to be smaller but I'm actually having trouble toning it down filesizewise.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:40,
archived)
>:(
You have offended my honour! *hurls a net over you and sells you to Chinese slave merchants*
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:45,
archived)
hohoho
if you're going to take offence at that, you want to be around when i'm in a bad mood!
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:47,
archived)
try saving it
as a GIF and see if that helps - there`s a lot of solid colour
(and I`m assuming you don`t have a flashy optimiser program)
...god I`m being fluffy tonight :-\
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:39,
archived)
(and I`m assuming you don`t have a flashy optimiser program)
...god I`m being fluffy tonight :-\
I've tried
Main pic increased to over 200 KB, smaller one hit 50. :(
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:46,
archived)
did you keep them at 256 colours?
or did you try reducing? the top one could go to 32, the bottom needs no more than 16, 8 would probably suffice
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:47,
archived)
ever tried
turning down the image quality?
that bottom one could be a GIF and lose no detail, but about 50% of the filesize... the top one probably would benefit similarly
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:34,
archived)
that bottom one could be a GIF and lose no detail, but about 50% of the filesize... the top one probably would benefit similarly
I thought that .gifs were larger than .jpgs
Anyhoo, I could tune down the image quality of the top one somewhat, but I've tried and failed with the bottom one.
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:36,
archived)
it's all relative
gifs work well on pics with few colours, sharp edges, and large areas with little change - both of these fit that mould well
jpeg works by removing the fine detail, which would masacre that (admittedly awful) "ha ha" background into unreadable sludge
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:39,
archived)
jpeg works by removing the fine detail, which would masacre that (admittedly awful) "ha ha" background into unreadable sludge
Ah, I see.
I'll go off and convert then.
The Ha Ha! background is intended to be awful too ;)
( ,
Fri 14 Nov 2003, 21:41,
archived)
The Ha Ha! background is intended to be awful too ;)