b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Games For Geeks » Message 5311713

[challenge entry] ...

From the Games For Geeks challenge. See all 145 entries (closed)

(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:01, archived)
# Waaaaaaah
I don't get it. I need a geek to explain!
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:06, archived)
# The long running debate:
If an irresistible force hits an immovable object what happens?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:07, archived)
# Right
I got that bit. But what's with the unusual hand gestures? It's not normal rock-scissors-paper...
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:09, archived)
# Pfft, that's nothing
RPS-25 is where it's at.

www.umop.com/rps25.htm
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:11, archived)
# Huzzar!
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:21, archived)
# Er,
I couldn't find the "official" hand gesture for irresistible force or unmovable object...so I just made 'em up :¬)
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:11, archived)
# contestant A is requiring a "rock lock"
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:14, archived)
# immovable object falls in love?
and wanks a bit?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:12, archived)
# i always though the answer was just that neither could exist?
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:17, archived)
# this^
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:19, archived)
# Ian Banks reckons
the immoveable object moves and the unstoppable force stops.

but what does he know
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:21, archived)
# erm...
that's roughly what i said...
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:23, archived)
# s'pose so.

*wanders off*
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:27, archived)
# what if they are on a smooth slope (no friction), and the unstoppable force has an initial velocity of 0.002m/s towards the immovable object?
the slope is at 4 degrees, and you can take acceleration due to gravity to be 9.8ms2?

edit: revised in an attempt to make me look smart (E in A-Level Physics)
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:28, archived)
# *YELLOW CARD*
no physics GCSE questions here
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:31, archived)
# it`s theoretical!
edit: also the distance between the two is 4m, and the immovable object is at the bottom of the slope*


*I`m sure there`s a technical term for "at the bottom of the slope"... at the slope`s anus or something
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:31, archived)
# you seem to be suggesting the force act through an object
the object with the force acting through it would just deform if the resistence of the immovable object was so high
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:37, archived)
# but it`s unstoppable AND TRAVELLING AT -==SPEEEEEEEEEEEEEED

THE ACE OF SPADES! THE ACE OF SPADES!
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:38, archived)
# hahahaha
i'll never see that song the same again...

*shudders*
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:40, archived)
# not exactly
a universe in which an unstobbable force exists is, by definition, a universe in which an immovable object cannot exist. and vice versa.
(, Fri 11 Nov 2005, 14:36, archived)
# They have a fight
triangle wins.Triangle man.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:50, archived)
# That's rather clever
Woo!
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:07, archived)
# ^ this
very much with knobs on.

My daughter tried to play Rock Paper Scissors with 11 friends simultaneously. I couldn't bare it for long.
(, Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:16, archived)