it`s theoretical!
edit: also the distance between the two is 4m, and the immovable object is at the bottom of the slope*
*I`m sure there`s a technical term for "at the bottom of the slope"... at the slope`s anus or something
( ,
Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:31,
archived)
*I`m sure there`s a technical term for "at the bottom of the slope"... at the slope`s anus or something
you seem to be suggesting the force act through an object
the object with the force acting through it would just deform if the resistence of the immovable object was so high
( ,
Thu 10 Nov 2005, 19:37,
archived)