b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Creationism » Message 7292654

[challenge entry] strangemeister
I hate to post a cheaty compo post without a picture, but are you honestly serious?

The only reason it's called a 'theory' is because that's what science is based on - assessing the facts and proposing ways to explain them, but always admitting that there could be another scientific way to explain them.

Of course, the 'theory' of creationism or whatever it is you crazy kids believe in these days is nowt like that: facts aren't examined, and those that believe in it are closed-minded enough to insist evolution is not taught 'so both sides of the argument are examined.' BS.

And for evidence for mutations: how the hell else do you explain selective breeding? Animals can be bred to a specific strain very rapidly; wolves can be bred into something resembling collie dogs in looks and behaviour in only a few generations.

And the only piece of 'evidence' creationists have is that that certain things can not evolve bit by bit, such as the flagella, as they would be obsolete. That's been proved wrong, as even crude motility is beneficial.

Rant over. Apologies for length of flagellum; it's only microscopic.

From the Creationism challenge. See all 279 entries (closed)

(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:32, archived)
# TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALK BOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:33, archived)
# ^ This
Take it elsewhere, texters.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:33, archived)
# 'ning good Doctor.
Fare thee well?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# Aye, nonny.
I am absolutely theta, man. You?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# oh ffs
I used to enjoy looking at this site, now its just noobs whining about text on pictuers or 51kb file sizes.

your all gay
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# haha
funny
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# why not reply
with a picture that says "fail" or soemthing, that would be really original
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:41, archived)
#
No it wouldn't
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:42, archived)
# fuck off noob
:p
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:40, archived)
# I concur
Not seen kittens and stuff for ages

edit: or cdc tomfoolery
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:42, archived)
# *breaks out emergency bunny*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:43, archived)
# that bunny has malfunctioned!
I cannot condone the safety of this bunny!

or that one
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:44, archived)
# HUZZAH!
freaky fucking bunny....
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:45, archived)
# Why not contribute some then? :)
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:47, archived)
# I
concur.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:42, archived)
# I apologise on behalf of b3ta
that you are not being suitably entertained
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:50, archived)
# this may be better as a reply down with strangemeister's post
you can still compo it there
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:33, archived)
# what the hell was wrong with replying in his thread?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:33, archived)
# Also
you're talking about as much rubbish as he did. Just in the opposite direction.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:34, archived)
# In your opinion
Which isn't supported by the scientific community.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 12:18, archived)
# NGGGG!!!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:33, archived)
# harold bishop?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# M Emmet Walsh
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# Ok buddy, hold your horses.
Fighting fire with fire will burn down both our houses.
Just relax and probably best to just delete this before the abuse rolls in
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:34, archived)
# Fighting fire with Fire does in fact work
As i learnt badly whilst having a deodorant can flamethrower battle with my friend. Long story short his can was more powerful and i got burned. His fire won!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# It's also how fire breaks work.
Pretty much standard fire-fighting technique.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Your story needs more burning
:)
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# Ok, so maybe you can fight fire with fire.
But lets not forget:
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:43, archived)
# Well ok
But you can only fight fire with fire for short periods of time before you both sustain minor burns.
You're still likely to burn down a house with a deodorant can flamethrower. Although you may need more than 1 can, or some fire support
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# hmm, this could be a new kids cartoon series
"can battlr's!"

"No ryo!! His can is too powerful"
"But but!! he burnt my father's neck in france!"
"Ahaha! We will soon see if you like it"

etc
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# YES!!!
Jolly jack do this please!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:39, archived)
# yeah!
:D
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:44, archived)
# 'ning stranger!
*ruffles fur*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# 'loes matey!
*smooths down fluff*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:43, archived)
# Becareful
We don't want to turn this into /talk!!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:34, archived)
# to quote Mark and Lard....




"No Neeeeeeed!"

(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:34, archived)
# anymore if this and i shall ignore you both.
theory or no theory.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:34, archived)
# I'll take theory!
*opens box*
Gravity! Yays!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# oh
the banker was going to offer you 'relativity' if you'd held out for the next round.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:41, archived)
# General or Special?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:51, archived)
# yes
serious evilution* discussion 0
kittins 1

kittins ftw

*genuine typo
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS!
WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! WORDS! etc...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# it's the power of smerg merm
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:39, archived)
# *unlocks bunker*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# *joins queue*
I have crisps and tea, can I come in?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Of course!
What flavour crisps?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# Lightly salted kettle chips
But if I can nip home first I have ready salted, smokey bacon, steak and onion, salt and vinegar and mini cheddars
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:40, archived)
# salt & vinegar square crisps?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# *makes a run for it*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# I have cake
*did big shop last night*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# reply to the orignal at least
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# Why are you here?
Why are you entering an IMAGE competition with text?
Why didn't you just reply to Strangemeister in his thread (which shouldn't have been there either)?
Is it Tuesday again already?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:35, archived)
# Oooh, and this day started so well

(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# arg
!

I know, I think we should have a war over it

everyone who dissagrees is wrong and must die

then, with the ones left

we pick a new subject and everyone who disagrees must die

then, we pick a new subject.. and etc

and yay! then the cockroaches feast on our carcasses and repeat the process
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# that's evolution for you
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# *badum*
-TISH-

:D
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:39, archived)
#
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Haha! Me likey
The only way Morrissey could be any good.

Guns don't kill people...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:41, archived)
# Can somebody summarise that to a single sentence
preferably a single word
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Bollocks
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:37, archived)
# Ta
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# smelge
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# Thankeee
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:41, archived)
# I can do it as a sentence:
"Dear Strangemeister, I don't know what I'm talking about either."

Not sure I can get it down to a single word.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)
# how about
MMMNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:42, archived)
# Groovey
I wish all the pointless shite I have to wade through could be condensed by other people and explained in simple to understand bites.

Y'know, like watching the one o'clock news.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:44, archived)
# You can't argue with types like
that. It's been brainwashed into their minds. Also, he/she may just be taking the piss.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:38, archived)