and stealing their moneyand being democratic and vetoing what they vote for and deciding anyway
:)
(:)
discomeats This canoe,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 7:52,
archived)
if people send money in to a tv or radio station, they obviously can afford to lose the funds.same as lottery ticket scams - if you're such a math noob that you 'gamble' on lotteries, you have no right to complain if the whole thing is rigged.
the veto would have ben acceptable if the cat had been givn a good name, but the difference between socks and pussy is negligible.
*goes off to fuck a sock*
:)
(the veto would have ben acceptable if the cat had been givn a good name, but the difference between socks and pussy is negligible.
*goes off to fuck a sock*
:)
postbear has metal knees,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 7:57,
archived)
I don't complain the lottery is riggedI know the universe hates me :)
I did win £10 once tho! hah! take that "probability" :)
(I did win £10 once tho! hah! take that "probability" :)
discomeats This canoe,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 8:02,
archived)
we just had a scandal in these parts.the lottery retailers and their immediate families were winning at 3000 times greater frequency than they should have, or some such.
i won $1500 or something a few years back. it was good fun.
(i won $1500 or something a few years back. it was good fun.
postbear has metal knees,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 8:04,
archived)
there was a bit of a thing a while agosome retailers were checking the serial numbers of scratch cards and keeping any winners for themselves and putting the known no winners back in the pile for the customers to buy
wonder what sort of naughtyness detection the lottery system has :)
I guess free money and being stupid enough to think that a computer won't notice exactly what you are doing is all it takes :)
(wonder what sort of naughtyness detection the lottery system has :)
I guess free money and being stupid enough to think that a computer won't notice exactly what you are doing is all it takes :)
discomeats This canoe,
Thu 20 Sep 2007, 8:15,
archived)